From f3340ae5f4ac6c60823bf4d14e1fcdbeaaec353c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Picciano Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 14:07:14 -0600 Subject: Remove old code related to static, it's not needed anymore --- .../_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md | 315 --------------------- 1 file changed, 315 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 static/src/_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md (limited to 'static/src/_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md') diff --git a/static/src/_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md b/static/src/_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md deleted file mode 100644 index 155068d..0000000 --- a/static/src/_posts/2021-07-14-how-to-secure-a-webapp.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,315 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: >- - How to Secure a Webapp -description: >- - Get ready to jump through some hoops. -tags: tech ---- - -In this post I will be documenting all security hoops that one must jump through -in order to consider their webapp secure. This list should not be considered -comprehensive, as I might have forgotten something or some new hoop might have -appeared since writing. - -For the context of this post a "webapp" will be considered to be an HTML/CSS/JS -website, loaded in a browser, with which users create and access accounts using -some set of credentials (probably username and password). In other words, most -popular websites today. This post will only cover those concerns which apply to -_all_ webapps of this nature, and so won't dive into any which might be incurred -by using one particular technology or another. - -Some of these hoops might seem redundant or optional. That may be the case. But -if you are building a website and are beholden to passing some third-party -security audit for any reason you'll likely find yourself being forced to -implement most, if not all, of these measures anyway. - -So without further ado, let's get started! - -## HTTPS - -At this point you have to use HTTPS, there's not excuse for not doing so. All -attempts to hit an HTTP endpoint should redirect to the equivalent HTTPS -endpoint, and you should be using [HSTS][hsts] to ensure that a browser is never -tricked into falling back to HTTP via some compromised DNS server. - -[hsts]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Strict-Transport-Security - -## Cookies - -Cookies are an old web technology, and have always been essentially broken. Each -cookie can have certain flags set on it which change their behavior, and some of -these flags are required at this point. - -### Secure - -If you're storing anything sensitive in a cookie (spoiler alert: you will be) -then you need to have the Secure flag set on it. This prevents the cookie from -being sent in a non-HTTPS request. - -### HTTPOnly - -The HTTPOnly flag protects a cookie from XSS attacks by preventing it from being -accessible from javascript. Any cookie which is storing sensitive information -_must_ have this flag set. In the **Authentication** section we will cover the -storage of session tokens, but the TLDR is that they have to be stored in an -HTTPOnly cookie. - -Practically, this means that your sessions architecture _must_ account for the -fact that the webapp itself will not have direct access to its persistent -session token(s), and therefore must have some other way of knowing that it's -logged in (e.g. a secondary, non-HTTPOnly cookie which contains no secrets but -only signals that the browser is logged in). - -### SameSite - -The SameSite attribute can be set to `Strict`, `Lax`, or `None`. `Lax` is the -default in modern browsers and is sufficient for most security concerns, but if -you can go with `Strict` that would be better. The downside of `Strict` is that -cookies won't be sent on initial page-load of a site. - -In any case, even though `Lax` is the default you should still set this -attribute manually (or your auditor might get to add another bullet point to -their report). - -## Authentication - -Authentication is obviously one of the juiciest targets for an attacker. It's -one thing to be able to trick a user into performing this or that action, but if -one can just log in _as_ the user then they essentially have free-reign over all -their information. - -### Password History - -Most websites use a username/password system as the first step of login. This -is.... fine. We've accepted it, at any rate. But there's a couple of hoops which -must be jumped through as a result of it, and the first is password history. - -I hope it goes without saying that one should be using a hashing algorithm like -bcrypt to store user passwords. But what is often not said is that, for each -user, you need to store the hashes of their last N passwords (where N is -something like 8). This way if they attempt to re-use an old password they are -not able to do so. The users must be protected from themselves, afterall. - -### Credential Stuffing/Account Enumeration - -A credential stuffing attack is one where credentials are stolen from one -website and then attempted to be used on another, in the hope that users have -re-used their username/password across multiple sites. When they occur it'll -often look like a botnet spamming the authentication endpoint with tons of -different credentials. - -Account enumeration is a similar attack: it's where an attacker finds a way to -get the webapp to tell them whether or not an account email/username exists in -the system, without needing to have the right password. This is often done by -analyzing the error messages returned from login or a similar endpoint (e.g. -"Sorry this username is taken"). They then run through all possible values for -that endpoint to try and enumerate which users actually exist in the system. - -Account enumeration is tricky because often those errors are extremely helpful, -and we'd _like_ to keep them if we can. - -I've bucketed both of these attacks in the same section because they have a -similar solution: proof-of-work. The idea is that, for each request to some -sensitive endpoint, the client must send some proof that they've done an -intensive CPU computation. - -Compared to IP-based rate-limiting, PoW is much more effective against botnets -(which have a limitless set of IPs from which to spam you), while also being -much less intrusive on your real users than a captcha. - -PoW stymies botnets because they are generally being hosted by low-power, -compromised machines. In addition the systems that run these botnets are pretty -shallow in capability, because it's more lucrative to rent the botnet out then -to actually use it yourself, so it's rare for a botnet operator to go to the -trouble of implementing your PoW algorithm in the first place. - -So stick a PoW requirement on any login or account creation endpoint, or any -other endpoint which might be used to enumerate accounts in the system. You can -even make the PoW difficulty rise in relation to number of recent attempts on -these endpoints, if you're feeling spry. - -### MFA - -All the PoW checks in the world won't help your poor user who isn't using a -different username/password for each website, and who got unlucky enough to have -those credentials leaked in a hack of a completely separate site than your own. -They also won't help your user if they _are_ using different username/passwords -for everything, but their machine gets straight up stolen IRL and the attacker -gets access to their credential storage. - -What _will_ help them in these cases, however, is if your site supports -multi-factor authentication, such as [TOTP][totp]. If it does then your user -will have a further line of defense in the form of another password which -changes every 30 seconds, and which can only be accessed from a secondary device -(like their phone). If your site claims to care about the security of your -user's account then MFA is an absolute requirement. - -It should be noted, however, that not all MFA is created equal. A TOTP system -is great, but a one-time code being sent over SMS or email is totally different -and not nearly as great. SMS is vulnerable to [SIM jacking][sim], which can be -easily used in a targeted attack against one of your users. One-time codes over -email are pointless for MFA, as most people have their email logged in on their -machine all the time, so if someone steals your user's machine they're still -screwed. - -In summary: MFA is essentially required, _especially_ if the user's account is -linked to anything valuable, and must be done with real MFA systems like TOTP, -not SMS or email. - -[totp]: https://www.twilio.com/docs/glossary/totp -[sim]: https://www.vice.com/en/article/3kx4ej/sim-jacking-mobile-phone-fraud - -### Login Notifications - -Whenever a user successfully logs into their account you should send them email -(or some other notification) letting them know it happened. This way if it -wasn't actually them who did so, but an attacker, they can perhaps act quickly -to lock down their account and prevent any further harm. The login notification -email should have some kind of link in it which can be used to immediately lock -the account. - -### Token Storage - -Once your user has logged into your webapp, it's up to you, the developer, to -store their session token(s) somewhere. The question is... where? Well this -one's easy, because there's only one right answer: HTTPOnly cookies (as alluded -to earlier). - -When storing session tokens you want to guard against XSS attacks which might -grab the tokens and send them to an attacker, allowing that attacker to hijack -the session and pose as the user. This means the following are not suitable -places to store the tokens: - -* Local storage. -* `window`, or anything which can be accessed via `window`. -* Non-HTTPOnly cookies. - -Any of these are trivial to find by a script running in the browser. If a -session token is ephemeral then it may be stored in a "normal" javascript -variable somewhere _as long as_ that variable isn't accessible from a global -context. But for any tokens which need to be persisted across browser restarts -an HTTPOnly cookie is your only option. - -## Cross-Site - -Speaking of XSS attacks, we have some more mitigation coming up... - -### CSP - -Setting a [CSP][csp] for your website is key to preventing XSS. A CSP allows you -to more tightly control the allowed origins of the various entities on your site -(be they scripts, styles, images, etc...). If an entity of unexpected origin -shows up it is disallowed. - -Be sure to avoid any usages of the policies labeled "unsafe" (go figure), -otherwise the CSP is rendered somewhat pointless. Also, when using hostname -based allowlisting try to be as narrow as you can in your allowlist, and -especially only include https hosts. If you can you should opt for the `nonce` -or `sha` policies. - -[csp]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/CSP - -### SVG - -A small but important note: if you're website allows users to upload images, -then be _very_ careful about allowing users to upload SVGs. SVGs are actually -XML documents, and even worse than that they allow `